New rig

that shoulsnt be a problem so far as i've read reviews etc.

I suppose Cooler Master's HAF line of cases are decently vibration resistant.

Hey i have a 9500GT as well!! Its good a card.

So is AMD better than Intel for gaming? Thats what i read, and its what i have.

AMD gives you better "bang for the buck" i personally prefer Intel though.

{GTB} birra wrote:Hey i have a 9500GT as well!! Its good a card.

I have a 9600GT birra, i dont know if your 9500 is the active or passive cooled version.
But somewhere on a benchmark i discovered that the active cooled 9600GT packs nearly twice as much power as the passive cooled 9500GT.
However if your happy with that 9500GT, and u want a low budget replacement, then you could consider taking a 9600GT, its cheap as shit and it can play modern warfare 2 at medium settings,
Wolfenstein can be played at max settings with 333 FPS.
shouldnt cost more than 60 euros nowadays.

{GTB} V-ReX wrote:I have a 9600GT birra, i dont know if your 9500 is the active or passion cooled version.

Haha! "passion cooled"

Didn't mean to type that o_0 edited it ^^
my rig is installed, its great ^^

I'm probably possibly getting mine set up next week. I won't leave the house for a week - downloading and playing all the latest games..

totally agreed

{GTB} V-ReX wrote:

{GTB} birra wrote:Hey i have a 9500GT as well!! Its good a card.

I have a 9600GT birra, i dont know if your 9500 is the active or passive cooled version.
But somewhere on a benchmark i discovered that the active cooled 9600GT packs nearly twice as much power as the passive cooled 9500GT.
However if your happy with that 9500GT, and u want a low budget replacement, then you could consider taking a 9600GT, its cheap as shit and it can play modern warfare 2 at medium settings,
Wolfenstein can be played at max settings with 333 FPS.
shouldnt cost more than 60 euros nowadays.

Think id rather upgrade to a more advanced card, rather than a small step from 9500 to 9600.

all i said was it being a money saving step,
if you got ena cahs id go for a better one too ofcourse

Pfft..You guys aint got nothing on me

hes only missing a portable fridge and its a dream come true

{GTB} Energy wrote:hes only missing a portable fridge and its a dream come true

FU*K YEAH finally got my rig to work...kinda, i mean the resolution kinda ...bad... its 1728x1026(well practically 1080i) but its my tv's fault as its only 720p and it only has vga pc connection and hdmi but not for pc use, i can still play mw2 maxed 1080p with over 90 fps :DD hopefully ill get around the new monitor.

Is 1728x1026 really bad? Mine is 1024x768!!

{GTB} birra wrote:Is 1728x1026 really bad? Mine is 1024x768!!

well you cant really see too much stuff as im running higher resolution than i actually should and im running resolution im not... if you know what i mean cause im running 1024x768 but the actuall resolution is 1920x1080 interlaced so it looks f-ed up

Sorry i didnt understand a thing! You gonna have to explain again! In a clear, understandable organised fashion.

{GTB} birra wrote:Sorry i didnt understand a thing! You gonna have to explain again! In a clear, understandable organised fashion.

*sigh, basically there are two types of signal, digital and analogue, analogue is variable all the time so the quality isnt always best, while digital always transferes data perfectly, old crt monitors and still lcd's use analogue like for example my tv which only has vga analogue connection, and digital hdmi, my graphics card only supports digital signal so i have to connect it through hdmi ports which transfer digital signal, but what the problem is my tv is only hd ready aka. 720 progressive, or 1080 interlaced so physically im running an 1080i digital signal from my computer to tv but my tv's hdmi wasn't intended as a computer connection so it has one resolution it can display and few lower that is supports so untill i get a proper full hd aka 1080p monitor i will not have great quality display as the monitor wont run on native resolution, i hope this makes sense and its simpliest way i can explain this

I have an analog 1920x1080 LG FLATRON E2241 something or other
It
is
AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :3

{GTB} URmS wrote:I have an analog 1920x1080 LG FLATRON E2241 something or other
It
is
AWESOMEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE :3

T-T and anlogue cant be 1080p 0.o you must be usin digital like hdmi or dvi or maybe displayport and still i really need to gwet new tv or monitor cause i either have to play each game windowed or smaller resolution( which can be difficult to set outside of the game like the moh was reall yhard to get it to be windowed) and i cant do it ingame as tv says that mode not supported :[ or i can play it 1920x1080 with a bit display trimed off

Well I use a DVI output, a DVI to VGA adapter and a VGA cable that connects to a VGA port on the back of my LG Full HD monitor... :3

My video card has 2 DVI outputs, 1 or 2 miniDisplayPorts and a HDMI port. One of the DVI outputs has a label on it sayin "digital". When i plug my monitor into that one, it won't work. The other one, the one i assume is "analog", works.

{GTB} URmS wrote:My video card has 2 DVI outputs, 1 or 2 miniDisplayPorts and a HDMI port. One of the DVI outputs has a label on it sayin "digital". When i plug my monitor into that one, it won't work. The other one, the one i assume is "analog", works.

well theres different types of dvi but i actually never heard that one card would use diferent ones, theres dvi-i dvi-d and dvi-a(i think not sure) dvi-i will support bith analogue and digital and d will only support digital but just using vga cable lowers the quality so if your monitor has better outputs you should be usin them but ohh well there isnt that much dramatic difference

as long as i see where i'm going it's all good :3